See which claims in your curriculum map your courses actually support.
Most curriculum maps are typed in by hand, one cell at a time, and checked only when a review is near. In the AI era, a mastery claim is only as good as the assignment behind it.
Start from what you have
Upload the map you already keep: a spreadsheet, a PDF, or an export from your current system. You confirm what Map Audit read, and nothing needs retyping. It works with your own level scheme.
A map, with its questions marked
Sample data
| Program outcome | Course 101 Core | Course 210 Core | Course 305 Core | Course 330 Core | Elective 350 Elective | Capstone 480 Capstone | Question for your committee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Written communication | I | R | M | ||||
| Quantitative reasoning | I | R | M | Mastery only in an elective. Does every student reach it? | |||
| Information literacy | No course carries this outcome. | ||||||
| Critical thinking | I | R | M | Mastery claimed. Nothing found behind it. |
What it looks for
Gaps
Outcomes the curriculum does not carry, or never takes as far as it says.
Paths
Whether every student's route to the degree reaches what the map promises.
Evidence
Whether each mastery claim has an assignment and a rubric behind it.
Your rules
The standards your own program sets for its map.
What you get
Findings your committee can act on, phrased as questions rather than verdicts. Every finding is about the map and the documents behind it, never about the quality of a course or an instructor. Run it again after changes, and you have a dated record of what changed.
No student data
Map Audit reads program documents only.
For assessment offices
See every program in a college or across the institution, without ranking or comparing instructors.
Try with one program's curriculum map
Early access opens to a small number of programs in Spring 2027.
Program offices: programs@richfeedback.com