Assessment for the AI era

Bring your assignments, curriculum and accreditation work into the AI era.

Three tools from RichFeedback, from a single assignment to your next accreditation review. Use one, or use them together under one sign-in.

Sample map, two rows

Outcome	Course 101	Course 305	Capstone 480
Critical thinking	I	R	M
Written communication	I	R	M

Claimed: mastery of critical thinking in the capstone.
Found behind it: no assignment or rubric.

Three tools, one purpose

See which parts of your assignment an AI can now do for a student, and get an AI-era rewrite that keeps your learning goals.

A curriculum map is a set of claims. See which ones your courses actually support.

Line your program's assessments up against the standards, and see which claims rest on evidence and which on assertion.

A faculty member's assignmentAssignment Refit

The program's curriculum mapMap Audit

The accreditation reviewAccreditation Crosswalk

Each tool stands alone. Together they share one record of your programs, courses and outcomes, so nothing is entered twice.

Syllabi now say something about AI. The graded work itself has mostly not changed.

Half

of the grade, in the median course we sampled, rested on take-home work with no design for AI

None

of the recent syllabi we sampled described a graded component redesigned for AI

47%

of faculty are modifying assessment design because of AI: 24% redesigning around it, 23% reverting to in-class or proctored work

Faculty who want their assignments to show learning again.
Program directors and chairs preparing a curriculum review.
Deans and associate deans who need a clear view across programs.
Assessment, institutional research and accreditation offices getting ready for the next visit.

RichFeedback has supported assessment of learning in higher education since 2010.