Line your program up against the standards, with evidence you can stand behind.
Accreditation asks what your students learn and how you know. Crosswalk shows, standard by standard, which of your claims rest on direct evidence and which on assertion.
What it does
- Takes your program's outcomes, assessment plan, assignments and rubrics, reusing what Map Audit already holds.
- Lines each assessment up with the outcomes it evidences and the standards that ask for it.
- Shows how much of the program's graded work has not yet been redesigned for AI, using Assignment Refit's reading across the whole program.
- Keeps a structured history of what your committee decided to change and when, so your use of results is written down as it happens.
- Drafts self-study sections in which every sentence points to the evidence behind it. You edit and own the words.
Built on the published standards
Crosswalk works from accreditors' own published standards, cited by name and number: institutional accreditors; business-school accreditors; and programmatic and professional accreditors, from engineering and computing to nursing, teacher education and the health professions.
When an accreditor moves to a new edition of its standards, Crosswalk holds both editions for as long as both are in force, so you work from the one that applies to your review.
Crosswalk prepares evidence. Your people make the judgments and write the case.
Your self-study should rest on claims you can stand behind.
Tell us when your next review is due and which standards apply.
Program offices: programs@richfeedback.com